Littles v. State
235 So. 2d 314, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6378
Opinion
The record before us does not indicate whether the reception of Littles’ plea of guilty complied with the standards of Boykin v. Alabama, 1969, 395 U.S. 238, 89 S.Ct. 1709, 23 L.Ed.2d 274, followed by this court in Rudolph v. State, 1970, 230 So.2d 14. Cf. Steinhauser v. State, Fla.App.1969, 228 So.2d 446.
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Littles v. State, 235 So. 2d 314, 1970 Fla. App. LEXIS 6378 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).
235 So. 2d 314 (Littles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Boykin v. Alabama
395 U.S. 238 (Supreme Court, 1969)
Steinhauser v. State
228 So. 2d 446 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1969)
Rudolph v. State
230 So. 2d 14 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1970)