Little v. Rowe

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Little v. Rowe

290 S.E.2d 556, 162 Ga. App. 215, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2115

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 29, 1982

Docket63946

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 290 S.E.2d 556 (Little v. Rowe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Little v. Rowe, 290 S.E.2d 556, 162 Ga. App. 215, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2115 (Ga. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

Deen, Presiding Judge.

John Little, d/b/a Ace Fence Company, brings this appeal following the denial of his motion for a new trial. He contends that the trial court erred in failing to find that the jury improperly awarded punitive damages, that the punitive damage award was excessive, and that the presence of a genuine issue of liability precluded an award of attorney fees. The trial testimony was not transcribed and, as counsel for the parties could not agree on a narrative of the evidence, the trial court ordered the brief of evidence prepared by the defendant be excluded from the record on appeal. Held:

Since there is no evidence before this court and the enumerations of error are all based on the evidence, the judgment of the trial court cannot be reviewed. Jenkins v. Jenkins, 231 Ga. 371 (202 SE2d 52) (1973).

Judgment affirmed.

Sognier and Pope, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Deen, Presiding Judge.

John Little, d/b/a Ace Fence Company, brings this appeal following the denial of his motion for a new trial. He contends that the trial court erred in failing to find that the jury improperly awarded punitive damages, that the punitive damage award was excessive, and that the presence of a genuine issue of liability precluded an award of attorney fees. The trial testimony was not transcribed and, as counsel for the parties could not agree on a narrative of the evidence, the trial court ordered the brief of evidence prepared by the defendant be excluded from the record on appeal. Held:

Since there is no evidence before this court and the enumerations of error are all based on the evidence, the judgment of the trial court cannot be reviewed. Jenkins v. Jenkins, 231 Ga. 371 (202 SE2d 52) (1973).

Judgment affirmed.

Sognier and Pope, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

290 S.E.2d 556, 162 Ga. App. 215, 1982 Ga. App. LEXIS 2115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/little-v-rowe-gactapp-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack