Jenkins v. Jenkins
This text of 202 S.E.2d 52 (Jenkins v. Jenkins) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This appeal is from a judgment finding that Jack Rogers Jenkins was in contempt of the trial court’s judgment requiring him to make certain child support payments and to pay certain attorney fees. The brief for the appellant states that the official court reporter was not present when the contempt case was tried and that counsel for the appellee would not agree to the stipulation of facts presented by him. The evidence has not been brought to this court by any of the methods provided in Code Ann. § 6-805 (Ga. L. 1965, pp. 18,24). Since there is no evidence before this court, the judgment of the trial court cannot be reviewed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
202 S.E.2d 52, 231 Ga. 371, 1973 Ga. LEXIS 707, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jenkins-v-jenkins-ga-1973.