Home/New York Court of Appeals/Litman v. Litman

Litman v. Litman

463 N.E.2d 34, 61 N.Y.2d 918, 474 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4165
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 20, 1984
StatusPublished
Cited by31 cases

This text of 463 N.E.2d 34 (Litman v. Litman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Litman v. Litman, 463 N.E.2d 34, 61 N.Y.2d 918, 474 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4165 (N.Y. 1984).

Opinion

*920 OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed, with costs, and question certified answered in the affirmative for the reasons stated in the Per Curiam opinion at the Appellate Division (93 AD2d 695). We cannot say that the expert opinion with respect to the economic value of the plaintiff’s law practice would not be of assistance in fashioning a distributive award under the statute.

Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer, Simons and Kaye.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hymowitz v. Hymowitz
119 A.D.3d 736 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
Cheney v. Cheney
86 A.D.3d 833 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
D'Amico v. D'Amico
66 A.D.3d 951 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Pechman v. Pechman
303 A.D.2d 479 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2003)
Tanzman v. Tanzman
191 Misc. 2d 215 (New York Supreme Court, 2002)
Fox v. Fox
290 A.D.2d 749 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2002)
Granade-Bastuck v. Bastuck
249 A.D.2d 444 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
Sangiorgio v. Sangiorgio
173 Misc. 2d 625 (New York Supreme Court, 1997)
MacDonald v. MacDonald
226 A.D.2d 596 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1996)
Rice v. Rice
222 A.D.2d 493 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1995)
McSparron v. McSparron
662 N.E.2d 745 (New York Court of Appeals, 1995)
Burns v. Burns
643 N.E.2d 80 (New York Court of Appeals, 1994)
DiCaprio v. DiCaprio
162 A.D.2d 944 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Richmond v. Richmond
779 P.2d 1211 (Alaska Supreme Court, 1989)
Stempler v. Stempler
143 A.D.2d 410 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Marcus v. Marcus
137 A.D.2d 131 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
Weinstein v. Weinstein
125 A.D.2d 301 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Litman v. Litman
123 A.D.2d 310 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)
Vanasco v. Vanasco
132 Misc. 2d 227 (New York Supreme Court, 1986)
Cronin v. Cronin
131 Misc. 2d 879 (New York Supreme Court, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
463 N.E.2d 34, 61 N.Y.2d 918, 474 N.Y.S.2d 718, 1984 N.Y. LEXIS 4165, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/litman-v-litman-ny-1984.