Liss & Marion, P.C. v. Recordex Acquisition Corp.

957 A.2d 1175, 598 Pa. 496, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1641

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Liss & Marion, P.C. v. Recordex Acquisition Corp.. Read the opinion of the Court — 603 Pa. 198 →

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 24, 2008·No. Appeal No. 725 EAL 2007·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of September, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as framed by Petitioners, are:

a. Does a private cause of action for breach of an implied contract arise out of a violation of the Medical Records Act?

b. Does the Medical Records Act require that copying of any records other than those stored on microfilm be billed at the rate specified for copying records stored on paper?

[497]*497c. Do common issues of fact and law predominate among members of the class certified by the trial court?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of September, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED. The issues, as framed by Petitioners, are:

a. Does a private cause of action for breach of an implied contract arise out of a violation of the Medical Records Act?

b. Does the Medical Records Act require that copying of any records other than those stored on microfilm be billed at the rate specified for copying records stored on paper?

[497]*497c. Do common issues of fact and law predominate among members of the class certified by the trial court?

Liss & Marion, P.C. v. Recordex Acquisition Corp., 957 A.2d 1175, 598 Pa. 496, 2008 Pa. LEXIS 1641 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

957 A.2d 1175 (Liss & Marion, P.C. v. Recordex Acquisition Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.