Liss & Marion, P.C. v. Recordex Acquisition Corp.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Liss & Marion, P.C. v. Recordex Acquisition Corp.

957 A.2d 1175

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 24, 2008·No. 725 EAL 2007·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of September, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal *1176 is GRANTED. The issues, as framed by Petitioners, are:

a.Does a private cause of action for breach of an implied contract arise out of a violation of the Medical Records Act?

b. Does the Medical Records Act require that copying of any records other than those stored on microfilm be billed at the rate specified for copying records stored on paper?

c. Do common issues of fact and law predominate among members of the class certified by the trial court?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

AND NOW, this 24th day of September, 2008, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal *1176 is GRANTED. The issues, as framed by Petitioners, are:

a.Does a private cause of action for breach of an implied contract arise out of a violation of the Medical Records Act?

b. Does the Medical Records Act require that copying of any records other than those stored on microfilm be billed at the rate specified for copying records stored on paper?

c. Do common issues of fact and law predominate among members of the class certified by the trial court?

Liss & Marion, P.C. v. Recordex Acquisition Corp., 957 A.2d 1175 (Pa. 2008).

Pincite

957 A.2d 1175 (Liss & Marion, P.C. v. Recordex Acquisition Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.