Lisa Ann Peluso v. Joseph Gustave Peluso, III

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedDecember 17, 2015
DocketA16I0077
StatusPublished

This text of Lisa Ann Peluso v. Joseph Gustave Peluso, III (Lisa Ann Peluso v. Joseph Gustave Peluso, III) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lisa Ann Peluso v. Joseph Gustave Peluso, III, (Ga. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia

ATLANTA,____________________ December 15, 2015

The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:

A16I0077. LISA ANN PELUSO v. JOSEPH GUSTAVE PELUSO, III.

On September 17, 2015, the trial court entered a discovery order in this divorce case. Twelve days later, on September 29, the court certified the order for immediate review. Lisa Ann Peluso then filed an application for interlocutory appeal in the Supreme Court, which transferred the matter here.

Under OCGA § 5-6-34 (b), a party may request interlocutory review only if the trial court certifies within ten days of entry of the order at issue that immediate review should be had. If the certificate of immediate review is not entered within that ten- day period, it is untimely, and the party seeking review must wait until final judgment to appeal. See OCGA § 5-6-34 (b); Turner v. Harper, 231 Ga. 175, 176 (200 SE2d 748) (1973); Van Schallern v. Stanco, 130 Ga. App. 687 (204 SE2d 317) (1974) (“[A] certificate for the immediate review of a nonfinal or interlocutory judgment is ineffective unless entered, i.e., filed with the clerk, within ten days after entry of the judgment appealed from.”).

In this case, the trial court did not enter its certificate of immediate review within ten days of the order that Lisa Ann Peluso seeks to appeal. Accordingly, we lack jurisdiction to consider this application for interlocutory appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED.

Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 12/15/2015 Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia. Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.

, Clerk.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Turner v. Harper
200 S.E.2d 748 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1973)
Schallern v. Stanco
204 S.E.2d 317 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1974)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lisa Ann Peluso v. Joseph Gustave Peluso, III, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lisa-ann-peluso-v-joseph-gustave-peluso-iii-gactapp-2015.