LIRANZO-CRUZATA v. State

6 So. 3d 114, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3202, 2009 WL 996839
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 15, 2009·No. 2D08-1026·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded with directions to reinstate the initial sentence of eight years in prison. See State v. Williams, 780 So.2d 1031 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (holding that trial court loses jurisdiction to rule on a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) motion to mitigate or modify sentence while direct appeal is pending; remanding with directions to reinstate the initial sentence); Othouse v. State, 912 So.2d 682 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (holding that notice of appeal divested circuit court of jurisdiction to rule on the pending rule 3.800(c) motion).

ALTENBERND, WHATLEY, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LIRANZO-CRUZATA v. State, 6 So. 3d 114, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3202, 2009 WL 996839 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

6 So. 3d 114 (LIRANZO-CRUZATA v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Wallace v. State
249 So. 3d 791 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Brian Wallace v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
Reyes v. State
83 So. 3d 974 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)