LIRANZO-CRUZATA v. State

6 So. 3d 114, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3202, 2009 WL 996839
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 15, 2009
Docket2D08-1026
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 6 So. 3d 114 (LIRANZO-CRUZATA v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
LIRANZO-CRUZATA v. State, 6 So. 3d 114, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3202, 2009 WL 996839 (Fla. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded with directions to reinstate the initial sentence of eight years in prison. See State v. Williams, 780 So.2d 1031 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (holding that trial court loses jurisdiction to rule on a Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c) motion to mitigate or modify sentence while direct appeal is pending; remanding with directions to reinstate the initial sentence); Othouse v. State, 912 So.2d 682 (Fla. 2d DCA 2005) (holding that notice of appeal divested circuit court of jurisdiction to rule on the pending rule 3.800(c) motion).

ALTENBERND, WHATLEY, and LaROSE, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wallace v. State
249 So. 3d 791 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Brian Wallace v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018
Reyes v. State
83 So. 3d 974 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 So. 3d 114, 2009 Fla. App. LEXIS 3202, 2009 WL 996839, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liranzo-cruzata-v-state-fladistctapp-2009.