LIRANZO-CRUZATA v. State

29 So. 3d 1220, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3610, 2010 WL 985604
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 19, 2010·No. 2D09-4332·Published

Opinion

KELLY, Judge.

Raul Liranzo-Cruzata appeals the denial of his motion to mitigate sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), as well as an order denying a motion to disqualify the successor judge who ruled on the motion. The denial of a motion to mitigate a sentence is not ap-pealable, Brown v. State, 707 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); accordingly that aspect of this appeal is dismissed. However, the denial of the motion to disqualify the successor judge is reviewable under this court’s jurisdiction to issue writs of prohibition. See Lusskin v. State, 717 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).

The petition for writ of prohibition is denied.

LaROSE and CRENSHAW, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LIRANZO-CRUZATA v. State, 29 So. 3d 1220, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3610, 2010 WL 985604 (Fla. Ct. App. 2010).

29 So. 3d 1220 (LIRANZO-CRUZATA v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. State
707 So. 2d 1191 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Lusskin v. State
717 So. 2d 1076 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)