LIRANZO-CRUZATA v. State
This text of 29 So. 3d 1220 (LIRANZO-CRUZATA v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Raul Liranzo-Cruzata appeals the denial of his motion to mitigate sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(c), as well as an order denying a motion to disqualify the successor judge who ruled on the motion. The denial of a motion to mitigate a sentence is not ap-pealable, Brown v. State, 707 So.2d 1191 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998); accordingly that aspect of this appeal is dismissed. However, the denial of the motion to disqualify the successor judge is reviewable under this court’s jurisdiction to issue writs of prohibition. See Lusskin v. State, 717 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998).
The petition for writ of prohibition is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
29 So. 3d 1220, 2010 Fla. App. LEXIS 3610, 2010 WL 985604, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liranzo-cruzata-v-state-fladistctapp-2010.