Lipton v. Johnson & Johnson

CourtDistrict Court, N.D. California
DecidedApril 8, 2020
Docket3:20-cv-01841
StatusUnknown

This text of Lipton v. Johnson & Johnson (Lipton v. Johnson & Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, N.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lipton v. Johnson & Johnson, (N.D. Cal. 2020).

Opinion

~~ ee NR em IN NAN NDEI NGAI Se em Ws NEI NE NAIR Wg SE em ED oe

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2738

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —206)

On October 4, 2016, the Panel transferred 10 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 220 F.Supp.3d 1356 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 1,889 additional action(s) have been transferred to the District of New Jersey. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Freda L. Wolfson. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the District of New Jersey and assigned to Judge Wolfson. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the District of New Jersey for the reasons stated in the order of October 4, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Freda L. Wolfson. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel. Inasmuch as no objection is pending at this time, the stay is lifted. FOR THE PANEL: Cree ee ed. ie. Hs Ye John W. Nichols Clerk of the Panel I HEREBY CERTIFY that the above and foregoing is a true and correct copy of the original on file in my office. UNITED STAT □□ : DISTRICLOPNEW dr □□ WILLIAM T. WALEH, eT By LL f/f

WwOAOW IWVILZL TINY. LFW LAMISIL FT eee AYN eM Oe

IN RE: JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION MDL No. 2738

SCHEDULE CTO-206 —- TAG-ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

CALIFORNIA NORTHERN CAN 3 20-01841 Lipton v. Johnson & Johnson et al

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Products Marketing, Sales Practices & Products Liability Litigation
220 F. Supp. 3d 1356 (Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, 2016)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Lipton v. Johnson & Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lipton-v-johnson-johnson-cand-2020.