Lipscomb v. Wills

District Court, S.D. Illinois·Decided July 1, 2025·No. 3:24-cv-01870·Unknown

Opinion

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS

KEON V. LIPSCOMB,

Plaintiff,

v. Case No. 24-cv-01870-SPM

C/O CHOATE, et al.,

Defendants.

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MCGLYN, District Judge: This matter is before the Court on the Motion for Entry of Default and Motion for Default Judgment filed by Plaintiff Lipscomb against Defendant Spiller. (Doc. 26, 27). For the reasons set forth below, the motions are denied. After Defendant Spiller failed to return requests for waiver of service, the Court directed the United States Marshals Service to formally serve process on Spiller. (Doc. 18, 19, 23, 24). Summons was returned executed on May 21, 2025, and Defendant Spiller’s answer to the Complaint was due May 28, 2025. (Doc. 25). On May 23, 2025, Plaintiff filed the current motions before the Court – Motion for Entry of Default and Motion for Default Judgment. On June 4, 2025, Attorney CreelGould entered his appearance on behalf of Defendant Spiller and filed a response to the motions. (Doc. 28, 29). In the response, Defendant Spiller asks the Court to deny the motions and to extend the deadline to file an answer to Plaintiff’s Complaint. (Doc. 29). The Court first notes that Plaintiff’s motions were premature and filed prior to the deadline for Defendant Spiller to file his answer. While ultimately Defendant Spiller did fail to timely respond to the Complaint, the Seventh Circuit has established policy favoring a trial on the merits of a case as opposed to default judgment. See, e.g., Cracco v. Vitran Exp., Inc., 559 F.3d 625, 631 (7th Cir. 2009). Defense counsel entered his appearance only a week after the deadline to answer prejudice Plaintiff given that this case is still in the early stages. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Entry of Default and Motion for Default Judgment are DENED. The request to extend the

deadline to answer the Complaint is GRANTED. Defendant Spiller’s answer is DEEMED timely filed. IT IS SO ORDERED.

DATED: July 1, 2025

_s/Stephen P. McGlynn_________ STEPHEN P. MCGLYNN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lipscomb v. Wills, (S.D. Ill. 2025).

Lipscomb v. Wills (Lipscomb v. Wills) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cracco v. Vitran Express, Inc.
559 F.3d 625 (Seventh Circuit, 2009)