Linville v. West

11 Vet. App. 172, 1998 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 497, 1998 WL 190506
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims·Decided April 21, 1998·No. No. 97-66·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

On March 4, 1998, counsel for the appellant filed a motion for recall of the Court’s judgment. On that same date, the Court received the appellant’s motion for reconsideration by the full Court.

Upon consideration of the foregoing and the record on appeal, and it not appearing that full Court reconsideration is necessary either to address a question of exceptional importance to the administration of laws affecting veterans’ benefits or to secure or [173]*173maintain uniformity of the Court’s decisions, it is

ORDERED that the appellant’s motions for recall of judgment and for reconsideration by the full Court are DENIED. The motions having been denied, the Court’s entry of judgment remains undisturbed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Linville v. West, 11 Vet. App. 172, 1998 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 497, 1998 WL 190506 (Cal. 1998).

11 Vet. App. 172 (Linville v. West) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lynch v. West
12 Vet. App. 293 (Veterans Claims, 1999)