Lindsey v. State
292 S.W.3d 610, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1371, 2009 WL 3051223
Opinion
*611 ORDER
Jerald Lindsey appeals the judgment dismissing his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to the escape rule. We find that the motion court did not err in dismissing Lindsey’s motion for post-conviction relief.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lindsey v. State, 292 S.W.3d 610, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1371, 2009 WL 3051223 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).
292 S.W.3d 610 (Lindsey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Care & Treatment of Hodges
292 S.W.3d 610 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)