Lindsey v. State

266 S.W.3d 341, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1421, 2008 WL 4630679
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 21, 2008·No. ED 90136·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Percy Lindsey appeals from the motion court’s denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lindsey v. State, 266 S.W.3d 341, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1421, 2008 WL 4630679 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

266 S.W.3d 341 (Lindsey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Guffey v. Guffey
266 S.W.3d 341 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)