Lindsey v. State
This text of 266 S.W.3d 341 (Lindsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Percy Lindsey appeals from the motion court’s denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm.
We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no prece-dential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
266 S.W.3d 341, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 1421, 2008 WL 4630679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsey-v-state-moctapp-2008.