Lindsey v. State
213 S.E.2d 165, 134 Ga. App. 44, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1896
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lindsey v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 135 Ga. App. 122 →
Opinion
The defendants were tried and convicted of the offense of shoplifting. Their appeal to this court is based solely on the grounds that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict against them. Held:
The evidence was amply sufficient to sustain the conviction although there was some discrepancy in the testimony of some of the state’s witnesses.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lindsey v. State, 213 S.E.2d 165, 134 Ga. App. 44, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1896 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975).
213 S.E.2d 165 (Lindsey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.