Lindsey v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Lindsey v. State

213 S.E.2d 165, 134 Ga. App. 44, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1896

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 19, 1975

Docket50263

StatusPublished

This text of 213 S.E.2d 165 (Lindsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lindsey v. State, 213 S.E.2d 165, 134 Ga. App. 44, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1896 (Ga. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Pannell, Presiding Judge.

The defendants were tried and convicted of the offense of shoplifting. Their appeal to this court is based solely on the grounds that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict against them. Held:

The evidence was amply sufficient to sustain the conviction although there was some discrepancy in the testimony of some of the state’s witnesses.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian and Clark, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pannell, Presiding Judge.

The defendants were tried and convicted of the offense of shoplifting. Their appeal to this court is based solely on the grounds that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict against them. Held:

The evidence was amply sufficient to sustain the conviction although there was some discrepancy in the testimony of some of the state’s witnesses.

Judgment affirmed.

Quillian and Clark, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

213 S.E.2d 165, 134 Ga. App. 44, 1975 Ga. App. LEXIS 1896, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsey-v-state-gactapp-1975.