Lindsey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

D. Wyoming

Lindsey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

929 F. Supp. 1435, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9405, 1996 WL 278790

CourtDistrict Court, D. Wyoming

DecidedMarch 28, 1996

Docket2:95-cr-00037

StatusPublished

This text of 929 F. Supp. 1435 (Lindsey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Wyoming primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lindsey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance, 929 F. Supp. 1435, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9405, 1996 WL 278790 (D. Wyo. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

VACATUR OF JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED NOVEMBER 8, 1995, AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

ALAN B. JOHNSON, Chief Judge.

After considering the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, this Court entered an Order and Judgment in favor of Plaintiff Sam J. Lindsey on November 8, 1995. Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company subsequently filed a timely Notice of Appeal, Plaintiff filed a cross-appeal, and jurisdiction in the matter was assumed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. That Court ordered the parties to submit to non-binding mediation. Af *1436 ter protracted negotiations, the parties reached an amicable resolution of their differences. The Tenth Circuit then conditionally dismissed the appeal, with an instruction that this Court should consider a request by the parties to vacate the Judgment and Order of November 8, 1995. See U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership, -U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 386, 130 L.Ed.2d 233 (1994). The parties subsequently have submitted a joint motion to this effect.

The Court has considered the parties’ Motion, the facts to which the parties stipulate, and the law controlling this issue. The Court finds that there are ample exceptional circumstances justifying vacatur as requested by the parties. See Rule 60(b)(5) and (6), Fed.R.Civ.P.; U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership, supra; Motta v. District Director, I.N.S., 61 F.3d 117 (1st Cir.1995); Alexander v. Perrill, 872 F.Supp. 722 (D.Ariz.1995). The Court further finds that the equities presented by the parties weigh in favor of the requested vacatur. It is therefore

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Court’s previous Order and Judgment, dated November 8, 1995, be and hereby are VACATED. This matter is further DISMISSED with prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

VACATUR OF JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED NOVEMBER 8, 1995, AND ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

ALAN B. JOHNSON, Chief Judge.

After considering the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment, this Court entered an Order and Judgment in favor of Plaintiff Sam J. Lindsey on November 8, 1995. Defendant Metropolitan Life Insurance Company subsequently filed a timely Notice of Appeal, Plaintiff filed a cross-appeal, and jurisdiction in the matter was assumed by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. That Court ordered the parties to submit to non-binding mediation. Af *1436 ter protracted negotiations, the parties reached an amicable resolution of their differences. The Tenth Circuit then conditionally dismissed the appeal, with an instruction that this Court should consider a request by the parties to vacate the Judgment and Order of November 8, 1995. See U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership, -U.S.-, 115 S.Ct. 386, 130 L.Ed.2d 233 (1994). The parties subsequently have submitted a joint motion to this effect.

The Court has considered the parties’ Motion, the facts to which the parties stipulate, and the law controlling this issue. The Court finds that there are ample exceptional circumstances justifying vacatur as requested by the parties. See Rule 60(b)(5) and (6), Fed.R.Civ.P.; U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership, supra; Motta v. District Director, I.N.S., 61 F.3d 117 (1st Cir.1995); Alexander v. Perrill, 872 F.Supp. 722 (D.Ariz.1995). The Court further finds that the equities presented by the parties weigh in favor of the requested vacatur. It is therefore

ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that the Court’s previous Order and Judgment, dated November 8, 1995, be and hereby are VACATED. This matter is further DISMISSED with prejudice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

929 F. Supp. 1435, 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9405, 1996 WL 278790, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindsey-v-metropolitan-life-insurance-wyd-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack