Alexander v. Perrill
This text of 872 F. Supp. 722 (Alexander v. Perrill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Arizona primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Plaintiff Kent G. Alexander and Defendants William A. Perrill and Luis Rivera jointly move for an order vacating this Court’s July 8, 1994 Amended Final Judgment and its published October 27, 1993 order and memorandum opinion. See Alexander v. Perrill, 836 F.Supp. 701 (D.Ariz.1993). While appeal was pending, the parties en: tered into a full and final settlement of their dispute.
After review of the joint motion and the exceptional circumstances present in this case, the Court finds that vacatur is appropriate and consistent with Ninth Circuit and United States Supreme Court precedence. See Ringsby Truck Lines, Inc. v. Western Conference of Teamsters, 686 F.2d 720 (9th Cir.1982); U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership, — U.S. --, 115 S.Ct. 386, 130 L.Ed.2d 233 (1994).
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the Joint Motion to Vacate Judgment and For Dismissal with Prejudice is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Amended Final Judgment entered July 8, 1994 and the Order entered October 27,1993 are VACATED and this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
872 F. Supp. 722, 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 831, 1995 WL 21719, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/alexander-v-perrill-azd-1995.