Lindley v. Easley

Court of Appeals of Texas

Lindley v. Easley

59 S.W.2d 930, 1932 Tex. App. LEXIS 1303

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMay 24, 1932

DocketNo. 1099

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 59 S.W.2d 930 (Lindley v. Easley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lindley v. Easley, 59 S.W.2d 930, 1932 Tex. App. LEXIS 1303 (Tex. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

HICKMAN, Chief Justice.

This case and case No. 1098(Tex. Civ. App.) 59 S.W.(2d) 927, by the same style this day decided are companion cases. They were tried together in the lower court, and but one statement of facts is brought up on appeal. The only differences between the two cases are in the descriptions of the land involved, amounts and dates of notes, and amounts of payments. There is a stipulation in the transcript in this case, signed by the attorneys and approved by the trial judge, of which the following is a part: “In event the Court of Civil Appeals or‘Supreme Cour,t shall affirm the judgment of the trial court in said Cause No. 1381-b (No. 109S-in this court) it is stipulated and agreed that the Court of Civil Appeals or the Supreme Court shall also affirm the judgment in this cause.”

In accordance with that stipulation, it is ordered that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HICKMAN, Chief Justice.

This case and case No. 1098(Tex. Civ. App.) 59 S.W.(2d) 927, by the same style this day decided are companion cases. They were tried together in the lower court, and but one statement of facts is brought up on appeal. The only differences between the two cases are in the descriptions of the land involved, amounts and dates of notes, and amounts of payments. There is a stipulation in the transcript in this case, signed by the attorneys and approved by the trial judge, of which the following is a part: “In event the Court of Civil Appeals or‘Supreme Cour,t shall affirm the judgment of the trial court in said Cause No. 1381-b (No. 109S-in this court) it is stipulated and agreed that the Court of Civil Appeals or the Supreme Court shall also affirm the judgment in this cause.”

In accordance with that stipulation, it is ordered that the judgment of the trial court be affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

59 S.W.2d 930, 1932 Tex. App. LEXIS 1303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lindley-v-easley-texapp-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack