Lindler v. SC Workers' Compensation Commission
Opinion
THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 239(d)(2), SCACR.
THE STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA
In The Supreme Court
Kellie Lindler, Appellant,
v.
The South Carolina Workers Compensation Commission and the South Carolina Budget and Control Board, Respondents.
Appeal From Richland County
Reginald I. Lloyd, Circuit Court Judge
Memorandum Opinion
No. 2007-MO-006
Heard December 5, 2006 Filed January 29, 2007
AFFIRMED
J. Lewis Cromer, of Cromer & Mabry, of Columbia, for Appellant.
Keith M. Babcock, of Lewis & Babcock, of Columbia, for Respondents.
PER CURIAM: Affirmed pursuant to Rule 220(b) (1) SCACR, and the following authorities: Botchie v. ODowd, 299 S.C. 329, 384 S.E.2d 787 (1989), Heath v. Aiken County, 295 S.C. 416, 368 S.E.2d 904 (1988), Anders v. Richland County Council, 284 S.C. 142, 325 S.E.2d 538 (1985).
AFFIRMED.
TOAL, C.J., MOORE, WALLER, BURNETT, JJ., and Acting Justice James W. Johnson, Jr., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lindler v. SC Workers' Compensation Commission (Lindler v. SC Workers' Compensation Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.