Linder v. Smith

30 N.E. 1073, 131 Ind. 147, 1892 Ind. LEXIS 155
Indiana Supreme Court·Decided April 8, 1892·No. No. 15,769·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Coffey, J.

This was an action in the Madison Circuit Court to recover a personal judgment for material furnished [148] and work and labor done and performed in the construction of a cistern.

Filed April 8, 1892.

Coupled with the allegations necessary to the recovery of a personal judgment were allegations seeking to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.

The court overruled a demurrer to the complaint, and this ruling is the only one discussed by counsel in their briefs.

The court did not err in this ruling.

Independent of the right to a mechanic’s lien the complaint was good as an action for a personal judgment. If a plaintiff is entitled to any substantial relief on the facts stated in his complaint, a demurrer thereto should be overruled. Howe v. Dibble, 45 Ind. 120.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Linder v. Smith, 30 N.E. 1073, 131 Ind. 147, 1892 Ind. LEXIS 155 (Ind. 1892).

30 N.E. 1073 (Linder v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Lamm
112 N.E. 45 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1916)
Harvey v. Hand
95 N.E. 1020 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1911)
Sebienske v. Downey
93 N.E. 1050 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1911)
Indianapolis Northern Traction Co. v. Brennan
87 N.E. 215 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1909)
Evansville & Princeton Traction Co. v. Broermann
80 N.E. 972 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1907)
Chicago & South Eastern Railway Co. v. Woodard
65 N.E. 577 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1902)
Fuller v. Cox
34 N.E. 822 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1893)