Linder v. Smith
Opinion
This was an action in the Madison Circuit Court to recover a personal judgment for material furnished [148] and work and labor done and performed in the construction of a cistern.
Coupled with the allegations necessary to the recovery of a personal judgment were allegations seeking to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.
The court overruled a demurrer to the complaint, and this ruling is the only one discussed by counsel in their briefs.
The court did not err in this ruling.
Independent of the right to a mechanic’s lien the complaint was good as an action for a personal judgment. If a plaintiff is entitled to any substantial relief on the facts stated in his complaint, a demurrer thereto should be overruled. Howe v. Dibble, 45 Ind. 120.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
30 N.E. 1073 (Linder v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.