Linder v. Smith
This text of 30 N.E. 1073 (Linder v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was an action in the Madison Circuit Court to recover a personal judgment for material furnished [148]*148and work and labor done and performed in the construction of a cistern.
Coupled with the allegations necessary to the recovery of a personal judgment were allegations seeking to foreclose a mechanic’s lien.
The court overruled a demurrer to the complaint, and this ruling is the only one discussed by counsel in their briefs.
The court did not err in this ruling.
Independent of the right to a mechanic’s lien the complaint was good as an action for a personal judgment. If a plaintiff is entitled to any substantial relief on the facts stated in his complaint, a demurrer thereto should be overruled. Howe v. Dibble, 45 Ind. 120.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
30 N.E. 1073, 131 Ind. 147, 1892 Ind. LEXIS 155, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/linder-v-smith-ind-1892.