Linder v. Friedman

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 1, 2008·No. 08-6253·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-6253

DAVID WILLIAM LINDER,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

v.

JEROME B. FRIEDMAN, Individually and in his official capacity,

Defendant - Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:07-cv-00292-RLW)

Submitted: June 26, 2008 Decided: July 1, 2008

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and WILKINS, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David William Linder, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

David William Linder appeals the district court’s order

adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing

Linder’s civil rights complaint, filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six

Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388

(1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. See Linder v. Friedman, No. 3:07-cv-00292-RLW (E.D. Va.

Jan. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts

and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

- 2 -

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Linder v. Friedman, (4th Cir. 2008).

Linder v. Friedman (Linder v. Friedman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related