Linder v. Friedman

283 F. App'x 168
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 1, 2008·No. No. 08-6253·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

David William Linder appeals the district court’s order adopting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and dismissing Linder’s civil rights complaint, filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Linder v. Friedman, No. 3:07-ev-00292-RLW, 2008 WL 80228 (E.D.Va. Jan. 7, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Linder v. Friedman, 283 F. App'x 168 (4th Cir. 2008).

283 F. App'x 168 (Linder v. Friedman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related