Lindell Bank and Trust Co. v. Dhp Investments, LLC

Missouri Court of Appeals

Lindell Bank and Trust Co. v. Dhp Investments, LLC

283 S.W.3d 307, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 637

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 19, 2009

DocketED 91595

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 283 S.W.3d 307 (Lindell Bank and Trust Co. v. Dhp Investments, LLC) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lindell Bank and Trust Co. v. Dhp Investments, LLC, 283 S.W.3d 307, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 637 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Bluehaven Funding, LLC (“Bluehaven”) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying its motion *308 to intervene. Bluehaven contends the trial court erred because: (1) it erroneously concluded that Bluehaven was not a party to the case; and (2) Bluehaven has an interest in the subject matter of the case that would be impaired and unprotected absent intervention. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the trial court’s judgment denying Blueha-ven’s Motion to Intervene is supported by substantial evidence, it is not against the weight of the evidence, and does not erroneously declare or apply the law. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI