Hobson v. State

283 S.W.3d 307, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 671, 2009 WL 1383695
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 19, 2009
DocketED 91074
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 283 S.W.3d 307 (Hobson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Hobson v. State, 283 S.W.3d 307, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 671, 2009 WL 1383695 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Dennis Hobson appeals from a judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing.

The findings and conclusion of the motion court are based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. No error of law appears. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth the facts and reason for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lindell Bank and Trust Co. v. Dhp Investments, LLC
283 S.W.3d 307 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
283 S.W.3d 307, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 671, 2009 WL 1383695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hobson-v-state-moctapp-2009.