Linda D. Tanner v. Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Julia Murray, Wendy Proctor, and Juan Rodriguez

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided April 15, 2025·No. 15-25-00008-CV·Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 15-25-00008-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/15/2025 6:37 AM CASE NO. 15-25-00008-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE CLERK FILED IN 15th COURT OF APPEALS In the Court of Appeals AUSTIN, TEXAS 4/15/2025 6:37:43 AM for the Fifteenth Judicial District of Texas CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE Clerk

Linda D. Tanner Appellant, vs. Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Juan Rodriguez, Wendy Proctor, and Julia Murray Appellees,

On Appeal from the 459 th Judicial District Court Travis County, Texas Cause No. D-1-GN-24-002987 Honorable Judge Laurie Eiserloh

Appellant Brief Appellant Requests Oral Argument

Linda D. Tanner Pro Se Lulu143134143 @gmail.com 2121 Handley Drive Apt 51 Fort Worth, TX 76112 817-204-8004

1 CERTIFICATE OF INTERESTED PERSONS Appell ant, Linda D. Tanner, certifies that the following li sted persons and entities as described in the fourth sentence of Rule 28 .2. l have an interest in the outcome of this case.

Appellant: Counsel for Appellant: Linda D. Tanner Pro Se Litigant 2 121 Handley Drive Apt 51 fort Wo1ih, TX 76112 Tel: 817-204-8004 lu lu l 43134 l 43 @gmail. com

Appellees: Counsel for Appellees:

Texas Health and Human Services Commission Giselle Ortiz Astacio Juan Rodriguez Texas State Bar No. 24103222 Wendy Proctor Lauren McGee Julia Murray Texas State Bar No. 24128835 Assistant Attorney Genera l Office of the Attorney Genera l of Texas Administrative Law Division P.O. Box 12548, Capito l Station Austin, TX 78711-2548 Telephone: (512) 475-4200 Griselle.OrtizAstacio@oag.texas .gov Lauren.McGee@oag.texas .gov

Respondent:

Honorable Judge Laurie Eiserloh 459 th Judicial District Court 1700 Guadalupe, 11 th floor Austin, TX 7870 I Tele: 512-854-9384 Fax: 512-854-9338

2 STATEMENT REGARDING ORAL ARGUMENT

Appellant, Linda D. Tanner, requests oral argument.

3 TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. Table of Statutes .............................................................. 5

2. Jurisdictional Statement ...................................................... 6

3. Issues Presented ............................................................... 7

4. Statement of Facts ............................................................. 8

5. Statement of the Case ......................................................... 11

6. Summary of the Argument ................................................... 12

7. Argument ........................................................................ 13

8. Conclusion ....................................................................... 19

9. Prayer ........................................................................................................................21

10. Certificate of Compliance .....................................................22

11. Certificate of Service ........................................................... 23

12. Appendix ........................................................................ 24

4 TABLE OF STATUTES AND AUTHORITIES

1. United States Code Title 42 § 1983

2. United States Code Title 42 § 1382a

3. Social Security Act Title IV

4. Texas Administrative Code, Title 1, Part 15, Chapter 372, Subchapter A, Rule 372.2

5. Texas Administrative Code, Title 1, Part 15, Chapter 372, Subchapter B, Division 7, Rule 372.404

6. Texas Administrative Code, Title 1, Part 15, Chapter 372, Subchapter B, Division 7, Rule 372.408

7. Texas Administrative Code, Title 1, Part 15, Chapter 372, Subchapter B, Division 7, Rule 372.5

8. The Texas Fair and Fraud Handbook 2300

9. Texas Works Handbook Section, A-1341.1

IO.Texas Works Handbook Section, A-1340

11. Texas Works Handbook Section, C-111

12. Texas Gov't Code Chapter 531, Sections: 531.027, 531.028, 531.031, 531.0055

13. The Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 45, Subtitle B, Chapter II, Part 205, Sections 205.5, 205.30, 205.36, 205.130

14. Tex. Gov't Code, Title 10, Subchapter A, Chapter 2001, Subchapter A

5 JURISDICTIONAL STATEMENT

This court has jurisdiction over this appeal pursuant to Tex. Gov't Code, Title 10, Subchapter A, Chapter 2001 , Subchapter A .

6 ISSUES PRESENTED

1. The timing for the submission of the judicial review.

2. The Texas HHSC is not applying the annual Federal Poverty Levels to the Budgetary Needs and Recognizable Needs charts when determining income eligibility and max grant amounts.

3. The Texas HHSC is not applying U.S.C. Title 42 § 1382a (b)(9) when determining eligible income amounts.

4. The Texas HHSC is not applying the child support requirements correctly for the TANF Cash Help program.

5 STATEMENT OF FACTS

1. The Appellant submitted her petition for judicial review on time.

2. The Appellant was denied TANF Cash Help benefits due to having an income too high for the recognizable needs test limit for a family of 3.

3. With an unearned income of$575 in child support per month, the Appellant was, in fact, eligible for these benefits. (This amount does not include the $75 deduction and the 1/3 deduction from U.S. Code Title 42 § 1382a (b)(9).

4. In the Texas Administrative Code (TAC) Rule 372.404- Countable and Excludable Income, it says that the Texas TANF Cash Help programs excludes any income federal law excludes.

5. United States Code Title 42 § 1382a - Public Health and Welfare - section (b) number (9) states that if the unearned income is from an absent parent for a child support payment, then 1/3 of each individual payment shall be deducted.

6. In the Texas Works Handbook C-111, it shows a chart that says the Budgetary Needs amounts are 100% of the annual Federal Poverty Level (FPL) provided by United States Department of Health and Human Services each year.

7. In the Texas Works Handbook C-111, it shows a chart that says the Recognizable Needs amounts are 25% of the Budgetary Needs amount.

8. In the Texas Works Handbook A-1341.1, it shows that the max grant amount for each family size should equal to 17% of the Federal Poverty

8 Level (FPL) provided by United States Department of Health and Human Services each year.

9. The current Budgetary Needs test amount is $751 for a family of 3.

IO.The current Recognizable Needs test amount is $188 for a family of 3.

11. The current Max Grant amount is $353 for a family of 3.

12. The Federal Poverty Level for the current year is supposed to be applied to the Budgetary Needs, Recognizable Needs, and Max Grant amounts for each family size.

13. The executive commissioner for the Texas HHSC is not updating these amounts annually and is supposed to.

14. The Federal Poverty Level for a family of 3 in 2025 is $26,650.

15. The correct amounts for a family of3 are: Budgetary Needs - $26,650, Recognizable Needs - $6,662.50, Max Grant - $4,530.50

16. According to the Federal Poverty Level for 2025 that is required by law to be in place when calculating income eligibility for the Texas TANF Cash Help program, my family of 3 is eligible for these benefits.

17. The TANF Cash Help program is applying the child support requirements for the applicant incorrectly.

18. They are keeping the applicants' child support payments and using them to "payback" what this applicant is receiving in monthly TANF Cash Help payments.

19. The Texas TANF Cash Help Program is not a loan program. The applicant is not taking out a loan when applying or receiving these benefits.

9 20.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Linda D. Tanner v. Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Julia Murray, Wendy Proctor, and Juan Rodriguez, (Tex. Ct. App. 2025).

Linda D. Tanner v. Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Julia Murray, Wendy Proctor, and Juan Rodriguez (Linda D. Tanner v. Texas Health and Human Services Commission, Julia Murray, Wendy Proctor, and Juan Rodriguez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Definitions
42 U.S.C. § 12511
Statement of purpose
42 U.S.C. § 5000
§ 403
37 U.S.C. § 403