Lincoln v. Power

Supreme Court

Lincoln v. Power

241 U.S. 651, 36 S. Ct. 721

Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 1, 1916·No. No. 793·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of (1) In re Luis Oteiza y Cortes, 136 U. S. 330, 334; Ornelas v. Ruiz, 161 U. S. 502, 508; [652]*652Bryant v. The United States, 167 U. S. 104, 105; Terlinden v. Ames, 184 U. S. 270, 278; Elias v. Ramirez, 215 U. S. 398, 406-407; McNamara v. Henkel, 226 U. S. 520, 523; (2) David Kauffman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580; Manila Investment Co. v. Trammell, 239 U. S. 31.

Mr. John Neville Boyle and Mr. Addison S. Pratt for the appellant. The Attorney General and Mr. Charles" Fox for the appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of (1) In re Luis Oteiza y Cortes, 136 U. S. 330, 334; Ornelas v. Ruiz, 161 U. S. 502, 508; [652]*652Bryant v. The United States, 167 U. S. 104, 105; Terlinden v. Ames, 184 U. S. 270, 278; Elias v. Ramirez, 215 U. S. 398, 406-407; McNamara v. Henkel, 226 U. S. 520, 523; (2) David Kauffman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580; Manila Investment Co. v. Trammell, 239 U. S. 31.

Mr. John Neville Boyle and Mr. Addison S. Pratt for the appellant. The Attorney General and Mr. Charles" Fox for the appellees.

Lincoln v. Power, 241 U.S. 651, 36 S. Ct. 721 (1916).

Pincite

241 U.S. 651 (Lincoln v. Power) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related