Home/Supreme Court/Lincoln v. Power

Lincoln v. Power

241 U.S. 651, 36 S. Ct. 721
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 1, 1916
DocketNo. 793
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 241 U.S. 651 (Lincoln v. Power) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lincoln v. Power, 241 U.S. 651, 36 S. Ct. 721 (1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Judgment affirmed with costs upon the authority of (1) In re Luis Oteiza y Cortes, 136 U. S. 330, 334; Ornelas v. Ruiz, 161 U. S. 502, 508; [652]*652Bryant v. The United States, 167 U. S. 104, 105; Terlinden v. Ames, 184 U. S. 270, 278; Elias v. Ramirez, 215 U. S. 398, 406-407; McNamara v. Henkel, 226 U. S. 520, 523; (2) David Kauffman & Sons Co. v. Smith, 216 U. S. 610; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580; Manila Investment Co. v. Trammell, 239 U. S. 31.

Mr. John Neville Boyle and Mr. Addison S. Pratt for the appellant. The Attorney General and Mr. Charles" Fox for the appellees.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re the Extradition of Koskotas
127 F.R.D. 13 (D. Massachusetts, 1989)
United States v. Mackin
668 F.2d 122 (Second Circuit, 1981)
Sindona v. Grant
619 F.2d 167 (Second Circuit, 1980)
Ignatius Timothy Tribich Lincoln v. James M. Power, Marshal, Etc
241 U.S. 651 (Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
241 U.S. 651, 36 S. Ct. 721, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lincoln-v-power-scotus-1916.