Lincoln Elec. Co. v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Lincoln Elec. Co. v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co.

3 N.E.3d 204, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1401

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided January 31, 2014·No. 2013-1088·Published

Opinion

Certified Question of State Law, United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, No. 1:11CV2253. This cause is pending before the court on the certification of a state-law question from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division.

Upon consideration of the motions for admission pro hac vice of Charles E. Spevacek, William M. Hart, and Bryce L. Friedman, it is ordered by the court that the motions are granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Certified Question of State Law, United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, No. 1:11CV2253. This cause is pending before the court on the certification of a state-law question from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division.

Upon consideration of the motions for admission pro hac vice of Charles E. Spevacek, William M. Hart, and Bryce L. Friedman, it is ordered by the court that the motions are granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

Lincoln Elec. Co. v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co., 3 N.E.3d 204, 138 Ohio St. 3d 1401 (Ohio 2014).

Pincite

3 N.E.3d 204 (Lincoln Elec. Co. v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.