Lincoln Elec. Co. v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co.

997 N.E.2d 549, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1405
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 14, 2013
Docket2013-1088
StatusPublished

This text of 997 N.E.2d 549 (Lincoln Elec. Co. v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lincoln Elec. Co. v. Travelers Cas. & Sur. Co., 997 N.E.2d 549, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1405 (Ohio 2013).

Opinion

Certified Question of State Law, United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, No. 1:11CV2253. This cause is pending before the court on the certification of a state law question from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division.

Upon consideration of the motions for admission pro hac vice of Mary Beth Forshaw and Alexander Simkin, it is ordered by the court that the motions are granted. Pursuant to Gov.Bar R. XII(4), counsel shall file a notice of permission to appear pro hac vice with the Supreme Court’s Office of Attorney Services within 30 days of the date of this entry.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
997 N.E.2d 549, 137 Ohio St. 3d 1405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lincoln-elec-co-v-travelers-cas-sur-co-ohio-2013.