Limberger v. Cleary

585 F. App'x 165
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 10, 2014·No. No. 14-1043·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Michael T. Cleary appeals from the district court’s order upholding the bankruptcy court’s orders reopening the adversary proceeding to allow additional evidence and determining that two debts that Cleary owed to Timothy and Lisa Limber-ger were non-dischargeable in Cleary’s bankruptcy proceeding. We have reviewed the record and the briefs filed on appeal, and we find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Limberger v. Cleary, No. 1:13-cv-01047-WMN, 2013 WL 6713188 (D.Md. Dec. 18, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Limberger v. Cleary, 585 F. App'x 165 (4th Cir. 2014).

585 F. App'x 165 (Limberger v. Cleary) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Verkon v. Ollis
D. South Carolina, 2021
Arguedas v. Ollis
D. South Carolina, 2021
Thompson v. Ollis
D. South Carolina, 2021
Chapman v. Ollis
D. South Carolina, 2021