Limberg v. Everhart
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 5 not include the filing date.
6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
7 CARL LIMBERG,
8 Plaintiff-Appellant,
9 v. No. 30,259
10 WILLIAM J. EVERHART, PATRICIA 11 EVERHART, and THE HARTFORD 12 FINANCIL SERVICES GROUP, INC., 13 d/b/a THE HARTFORD,
14 Defendants-Appellees.
15 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LUNA COUNTY 16 Daniel Viramontes, District Judge
17 Sherman & Sherman 18 Frederick H. Sherman 19 Deming, NM
20 for Appellant
21 Riley & Shane, P.A. 22 Mark J. Riley 23 Kristin J. Dalton 24 Albuquerque, NM
25 for Appellees
26 MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 SUTIN, Judge.
2 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of
3 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has
4 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
5 DISMISSED.
6 IT IS SO ORDERED.
7 __________________________________ 8 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
9 WE CONCUR:
10 ______________________________ 11 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge
12 ______________________________ 13 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Limberg v. Everhart (Limberg v. Everhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.