Limberg v. Everhart

New Mexico Court of Appeals·Decided July 8, 2010·No. 30,259·Unpublished

Opinion

1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 5 not include the filing date.

6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO

7 CARL LIMBERG,

8 Plaintiff-Appellant,

9 v. No. 30,259

10 WILLIAM J. EVERHART, PATRICIA 11 EVERHART, and THE HARTFORD 12 FINANCIL SERVICES GROUP, INC., 13 d/b/a THE HARTFORD,

14 Defendants-Appellees.

15 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LUNA COUNTY 16 Daniel Viramontes, District Judge

17 Sherman & Sherman 18 Frederick H. Sherman 19 Deming, NM

20 for Appellant

21 Riley & Shane, P.A. 22 Mark J. Riley 23 Kristin J. Dalton 24 Albuquerque, NM

25 for Appellees

26 MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 SUTIN, Judge.

2 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of

3 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has

4 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.

5 DISMISSED.

6 IT IS SO ORDERED.

7 __________________________________ 8 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge

9 WE CONCUR:

10 ______________________________ 11 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge

12 ______________________________ 13 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Limberg v. Everhart, (N.M. Ct. App. 2010).

Limberg v. Everhart (Limberg v. Everhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.