Limberg v. Everhart
This text of Limberg v. Everhart (Limberg v. Everhart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Mexico Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please 2 see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. 3 Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated 4 errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does 5 not include the filing date.
6 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
7 CARL LIMBERG,
8 Plaintiff-Appellant,
9 v. No. 30,259
10 WILLIAM J. EVERHART, PATRICIA 11 EVERHART, and THE HARTFORD 12 FINANCIL SERVICES GROUP, INC., 13 d/b/a THE HARTFORD,
14 Defendants-Appellees.
15 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LUNA COUNTY 16 Daniel Viramontes, District Judge
17 Sherman & Sherman 18 Frederick H. Sherman 19 Deming, NM
20 for Appellant
21 Riley & Shane, P.A. 22 Mark J. Riley 23 Kristin J. Dalton 24 Albuquerque, NM
25 for Appellees
26 MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 SUTIN, Judge.
2 Summary dismissal was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of
3 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary dismissal has
4 been filed and the time for doing so has expired.
5 DISMISSED.
6 IT IS SO ORDERED.
7 __________________________________ 8 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
9 WE CONCUR:
10 ______________________________ 11 CYNTHIA A. FRY, Chief Judge
12 ______________________________ 13 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Limberg v. Everhart, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/limberg-v-everhart-nmctapp-2010.