Home/U.S. Customs Court/Lilly v. United States

Lilly v. United States

23 Cust. Ct. 140, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 762
CourtUnited States Customs Court
DecidedJuly 26, 1949
DocketNo. 53425; protests 133691-K, 133692-K, and 133693-K (Indianapolis)
StatusPublished

This text of 23 Cust. Ct. 140 (Lilly v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lilly v. United States, 23 Cust. Ct. 140, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 762 (cusc 1949).

Opinion

Opinion by

Cole, J.

It was stipulated that the' merchandise consists of ox gall the same in all material respects as the substance passed upon in G. D. Searle & Co. v. United States (21 Cust. Ct. 112, C. D. 1138). The claim for free entry under paragraph 1669 was therefore sustained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

G. D. Searle & Co. v. United States
21 Cust. Ct. 112 (U.S. Customs Court, 1948)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
23 Cust. Ct. 140, 1949 Cust. Ct. LEXIS 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lilly-v-united-states-cusc-1949.