Lilly v. Prudential Insurance
587 A.2d 629, 246 N.J. Super. 280, 1991 N.J. Super. LEXIS 65
Opinion
The summary judgment of the Law Division which declared that plaintiff Marilyn R. Lilly was entitled to personal injury protection benefits under a policy of insurance issued by defendant Prudential Insurance Company (more properly referred to as Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company) is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Menza in his written opinion which is reported as Lilly v. Prudential Insurance Company, 246 N.J.Super. 357, 587 A.2d 672 (Law Div.1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lilly v. Prudential Insurance, 587 A.2d 629, 246 N.J. Super. 280, 1991 N.J. Super. LEXIS 65 (N.J. Ct. App. 1991).
587 A.2d 629 (Lilly v. Prudential Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Carmichael v. Bryan
707 A.2d 1357 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1998)
George H. Swatek, Inc. v. North Star Graphics, Inc.
587 A.2d 629 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1991)