Lilly v. Prudential Insurance
This text of 587 A.2d 629 (Lilly v. Prudential Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The summary judgment of the Law Division which declared that plaintiff Marilyn R. Lilly was entitled to personal injury protection benefits under a policy of insurance issued by defendant Prudential Insurance Company (more properly referred to as Prudential Property and Casualty Insurance Company) is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Menza in his written opinion which is reported as Lilly v. Prudential Insurance Company, 246 N.J.Super. 357, 587 A.2d 672 (Law Div.1990).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
587 A.2d 629, 246 N.J. Super. 280, 1991 N.J. Super. LEXIS 65, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lilly-v-prudential-insurance-njsuperctappdiv-1991.