Lillian Kral v. Sisters of the Third Order Regular of St. Francis of the Congregation of Our Lady of Lourdes

Third Circuit

Lillian Kral v. Sisters of the Third Order Regular of St. Francis of the Congregation of Our Lady of Lourdes

746 F.2d 450, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 17643

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedOctober 17, 1984

Docket84-5048

StatusPublished

Cited by9 cases

This text of 746 F.2d 450 (Lillian Kral v. Sisters of the Third Order Regular of St. Francis of the Congregation of Our Lady of Lourdes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lillian Kral v. Sisters of the Third Order Regular of St. Francis of the Congregation of Our Lady of Lourdes, 746 F.2d 450, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 17643 (3d Cir. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the District Court’s 1 dismissal of a complaint alleging that the defendant, an order of sisters in the Roman Catholic Church, had wrongfully expelled the plaintiff from membership. We affirm.

The theory of the complaint is that the plaintiff was mentally ill at the time of her expulsion, and that canon law prohibits expulsion in this situation. Plaintiff’s case was considered by the highest church court of competent jurisdiction before her expulsion took place, and that court found that she was not mentally ill. Whatever the merits of that finding as a matter of fact, it is not within our province to review it. A claim of violation of the law of a hierarchical church, once rejected by the church’s judicial authorities, is not subject to revision in the secular courts. See, e.g., Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese v. Milivojevich, 426 U.S. 696, 712, 96 S.Ct, 2372, 2381, 49 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976).

We are in substantial agreement with the District Court’s well-reasoned opinion. See 8th Cir.R. 14.

1

. The Hon. Edward J. Devitt, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the District Court’s 1 dismissal of a complaint alleging that the defendant, an order of sisters in the Roman Catholic Church, had wrongfully expelled the plaintiff from membership. We affirm.

The theory of the complaint is that the plaintiff was mentally ill at the time of her expulsion, and that canon law prohibits expulsion in this situation. Plaintiff’s case was considered by the highest church court of competent jurisdiction before her expulsion took place, and that court found that she was not mentally ill. Whatever the merits of that finding as a matter of fact, it is not within our province to review it. A claim of violation of the law of a hierarchical church, once rejected by the church’s judicial authorities, is not subject to revision in the secular courts. See, e.g., Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese v. Milivojevich, 426 U.S. 696, 712, 96 S.Ct, 2372, 2381, 49 L.Ed.2d 151 (1976).

We are in substantial agreement with the District Court’s well-reasoned opinion. See 8th Cir.R. 14.

1

. The Hon. Edward J. Devitt, Senior United States District Judge for the District of Minnesota.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

746 F.2d 450, 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 17643, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lillian-kral-v-sisters-of-the-third-order-regular-of-st-francis-of-the-ca3-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack