Likay v. Gottesman

235 A.D. 858
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1932·No. Appeal No. 1·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—Motion for reargument granted. Present — Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Tompkins, JJ. [See ante,"p. 820.] On reargument, order appealed from reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and plaintiff’s motion to punish for contempt of court denied without prejudice to renewal. The Special Term was without power to punish defendants for contempt by fine or imprisonment without proof of personal service of the order directing discovery and inspection. On further consideration we think the answers of the defendants should not be struck out. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Likay v. Gottesman, 235 A.D. 858 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

235 A.D. 858 (Likay v. Gottesman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

New England Industries, Inc. v. Margiotti
270 A.D. 488 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)
New England Industries, Inc. v. Margiotti
185 Misc. 845 (New York Supreme Court, 1945)