Likay v. Gottesman

235 A.D. 820
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1932
DocketAppeal No. 1
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 235 A.D. 820 (Likay v. Gottesman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Likay v. Gottesman, 235 A.D. 820 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Opinion

Order modified by striking out the provision adjudging defendants Gottesman and Weiss in contempt and directing their imprisonment, and by adding thereto the provision [821]*821that their answers be struck out because of their disobedience of the order of discovery and inspection. As so modified, the order is affirmed, without costs, and without prejudice to a renewal of the application to punish for contempt upon service of the order of discovery and inspection on these defendants personally. The Special Term was without power to punish the defendants for contempt by imprisonment or fine without proof of personal service of the order directing discovery and inspection. Lazansky, P. J., Kapper, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Card v. Houghton
179 Misc. 33 (New York Supreme Court, 1942)
Shier v. President Land Co.
248 A.D. 640 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1936)
Rapaport v. Dubrow
245 A.D. 735 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)
Cone v. Bernanke
154 Misc. 798 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1935)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
235 A.D. 820, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/likay-v-gottesman-nyappdiv-1932.