Ligon v. Lumpkin County

582 S.E.2d 504, 261 Ga. App. 435, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1587, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 599
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMay 13, 2003
DocketA03A1117
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 582 S.E.2d 504 (Ligon v. Lumpkin County) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ligon v. Lumpkin County, 582 S.E.2d 504, 261 Ga. App. 435, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1587, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 599 (Ga. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

Blackburn, Presiding Judge.

Acting pro se, Melvin K. Ligón sued Lumpkin County, Sheriff Jimmy Berry, and Commissioner Charles Ridley for false arrest, malicious prosecution, dereliction of duty, and malfeasance. Apparently, Ligon’s lawsuit was the culmination of a longstanding property dispute between Ligón and his neighbors in Lumpkin County. Although Ligón now seeks to contest the summary judgment obtained by the defendants, we must affirm due to his failure to include key portions of the record required for appellate review.

In granting summary judgment, the trial court found that sovereign immunity foreclosed Ligon’s claims against Lumpkin County and the individual defendants in their official capacities. In addition, the trial court decided that the evidence failed to demonstrate “any cognizable claim against Commissioner Charles Ridley upon which relief may be granted.” The trial court also determined that Ligón failed to establish that Sheriff Berry had negligently performed a ministerial duty or performed a discretionary function with actual malice toward Ligón.

On appeal, the burden is on the appealing party to show error affirmatively by the record. Dillman v. Kahres.1 When that burden is not met, the judgment in issue is assumed to be correct and must be affirmed. Johnson v. Collins.2 When an appellant fails to include evidence considered by the court on summary judgment, that omission is generally fatal. Tahamtan v. Sawnee Elec. Membership Corp.3

Here, in filing his amended notice of appeal, Ligón asked only for the inclusion of the original complaint, the answer; and the order to dismiss the case. Therefore, in the absence of any evidence of record [436]*436to the contrary, we must assume the correctness of the trial court’s judgment and affirm. See White v. Arthur Enterprises.4

Decided May 13, 2003 Reconsideration denied June 2,2003 Melvin K. Ligón, pro se. Terry E. Williams & Associates, Terry E. Williams, Gary K. Morris, Jason C. Waymire, for appellees.

Judgment affirmed.

Ellington and Phipps, JJ, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Alexander Law Firm, P.C. v. Curtis Richburg
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2021
Knight v. CITY OF HOGANSVILLE
723 S.E.2d 442 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
582 S.E.2d 504, 261 Ga. App. 435, 2003 Fulton County D. Rep. 1587, 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 599, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ligon-v-lumpkin-county-gactapp-2003.