Knight v. CITY OF HOGANSVILLE

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Knight v. CITY OF HOGANSVILLE

723 S.E.2d 442, 314 Ga. App. 233, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 287, 2012 WL 181570, 2012 Ga. App. LEXIS 43

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJanuary 24, 2012

DocketA11A2269

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 723 S.E.2d 442 (Knight v. CITY OF HOGANSVILLE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Knight v. CITY OF HOGANSVILLE, 723 S.E.2d 442, 314 Ga. App. 233, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 287, 2012 WL 181570, 2012 Ga. App. LEXIS 43 (Ga. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

MILLER, Judge.

Christi Knight fell and was injured when her right foot became caught in an uncapped sewer clean out that was owned and maintained by the City of Hogansville (the “City”). Knight sued the City, asserting various claims of negligence for failure to maintain and/or inspect the sewer clean out. The City moved for summary judgment, arguing that Knight’s claims were barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity, that it had no duty to maintain the area, and that it had no notice of the alleged defect. The trial court granted the City’s motion. Knight appeals from that ruling, contending that the trial court erred in concluding that the City had no notice of the hazard. As Knight has failed to include key portions of the record required for appellate review of this issue, we must affirm.

On appeal, the burden is on the appealing party to show error affirmatively by the record. When that burden is not met, the judgment in issue is assumed to be correct and must be affirmed. When an appellant fails to include evidence considered by the court on summary judgment, that omission is generally fatal.

(Citations and footnotes omitted.) Ligon v. Lumpkin County, 261 Ga. App. 435 (582 SE2d 504) (2003); see also Blazi v. Rich, 306 Ga. App. 529, 530-531 (2) (702 SE2d 768) (2010) (“Our review is impossible if the appellant omits the very evidence at the heart of our inquiry.”) (citations and punctuation omitted).

In her amended notice of appeal, Knight stated that the parties would submit the record and index to this Court. Knight failed, however, to include a copy of her deposition, which the trial court relied upon as evidence supporting its ruling. In the absence of Knight’s deposition transcript, we must assume that the trial court’s rulings were correct and affirm. Ligon, supra, 261 Ga. App. at 435; Blazi, supra, 306 Ga. App. at 531 (2).

Judgment affirmed.

Ellington, C. J., and Doyle, P. J., concur. *234 Decided January 24, 2012 Reconsideration denied February 21, 2012 Graylin C. Ward, for appellant. Whalen & Westbury, Andrew J. Whalen III, Leigh C. Hancher, for appellee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MILLER, Judge.

Christi Knight fell and was injured when her right foot became caught in an uncapped sewer clean out that was owned and maintained by the City of Hogansville (the “City”). Knight sued the City, asserting various claims of negligence for failure to maintain and/or inspect the sewer clean out. The City moved for summary judgment, arguing that Knight’s claims were barred by the doctrine of sovereign immunity, that it had no duty to maintain the area, and that it had no notice of the alleged defect. The trial court granted the City’s motion. Knight appeals from that ruling, contending that the trial court erred in concluding that the City had no notice of the hazard. As Knight has failed to include key portions of the record required for appellate review of this issue, we must affirm.

On appeal, the burden is on the appealing party to show error affirmatively by the record. When that burden is not met, the judgment in issue is assumed to be correct and must be affirmed. When an appellant fails to include evidence considered by the court on summary judgment, that omission is generally fatal.

(Citations and footnotes omitted.) Ligon v. Lumpkin County, 261 Ga. App. 435 (582 SE2d 504) (2003); see also Blazi v. Rich, 306 Ga. App. 529, 530-531 (2) (702 SE2d 768) (2010) (“Our review is impossible if the appellant omits the very evidence at the heart of our inquiry.”) (citations and punctuation omitted).

In her amended notice of appeal, Knight stated that the parties would submit the record and index to this Court. Knight failed, however, to include a copy of her deposition, which the trial court relied upon as evidence supporting its ruling. In the absence of Knight’s deposition transcript, we must assume that the trial court’s rulings were correct and affirm. Ligon, supra, 261 Ga. App. at 435; Blazi, supra, 306 Ga. App. at 531 (2).

Judgment affirmed.

Ellington, C. J., and Doyle, P. J., concur. *234 Decided January 24, 2012 Reconsideration denied February 21, 2012 Graylin C. Ward, for appellant. Whalen & Westbury, Andrew J. Whalen III, Leigh C. Hancher, for appellee.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

723 S.E.2d 442, 314 Ga. App. 233, 2012 Fulton County D. Rep. 287, 2012 WL 181570, 2012 Ga. App. LEXIS 43, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/knight-v-city-of-hogansville-gactapp-2012.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack