Ligon v. Bloodman
This text of 2016 Ark. 191 (Ligon v. Bloodman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Cite as 2016 Ark. 191
SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. D-16-301
STARK LIGON, AS EXECUTIVE Opinion Delivered April 28, 2016 DIRECTOR OF THE SUPREME COURT COMMITTEE ON PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT PETITIONER MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF SPECIAL JUDGE V.
TERESA LYNETTE BLOODMAN, ATTORNEY AT LAW, ABN 2005055 RESPONDENT SPECIAL JUDGE APPOINTED.
PER CURIAM
Stark Ligon, Executive Director of the Arkansas Supreme Court Committee on
Professional Conduct, has filed a petition for disbarment against the respondent, Teresa
Lynette Bloodman.
Pursuant to section 13(A) of the Procedures of the Arkansas Supreme Court
Regulating Professional Conduct of Attorneys at Law, a special judge shall be appointed to
preside over the disbarment proceedings in the instant case. After hearing all the evidence
relevant to the alleged misconduct, the judge shall make findings of fact, conclusions of law,
and recommendations of an appropriate sanction, and shall file them, along with a transcript
and the record of the proceedings, with the clerk of the supreme court.
We hereby appoint the Honorable Kim Smith as a special judge to hear this matter and
to provide the court with findings of fact, conclusions of law, and recommendations of an Cite as 2016 Ark. 191
appropriate sanction. Upon receipt of the special judge’s findings, we will render a decision
in this matter.
It is so ordered.
WOOD, J., not participating.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2016 Ark. 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ligon-v-bloodman-ark-2016.