Lightsey v. State
992 So. 2d 292, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 14222, 2008 WL 4224318
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lightsey v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 14309 →
Opinion
We affirm the order denying the defendant’s motion to correct illegal sentence, without prejudice for the defendant to file a facially sufficient motion on ground one as to the imposition of consecutive sentences.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lightsey v. State, 992 So. 2d 292, 2008 Fla. App. LEXIS 14222, 2008 WL 4224318 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).
992 So. 2d 292 (Lightsey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.