Lightsey v. State

53 So. 3d 1093, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 564, 2011 WL 148824
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 19, 2011·No. 1D10-4458·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Alonzo Lightsey moved to disqualify the presiding judge several months after he filed his motion for postconviction relief. The motion to disqualify was properly served and the judge did not rule on the motion within the time provided by Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.330(j). Under that rule, the motion is therefore deemed granted and petitioner is entitled to reassignment of his postconviction motion to a different judge. See Berube v. State, 978 So.2d 893 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). We therefore grant the petition and quash the order which denied the motion for disqualification. The cause is remanded to the circuit court with directions that the motion for postconviction relief be reassigned to a different judge.

PETITION GRANTED.

WOLF, KAHN, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lightsey v. State, 53 So. 3d 1093, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 564, 2011 WL 148824 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

53 So. 3d 1093 (Lightsey v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hilliard v. State
109 So. 3d 878 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)