Lightsey v. State

53 So. 3d 1093, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 564, 2011 WL 148824
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 19, 2011
Docket1D10-4458
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 53 So. 3d 1093 (Lightsey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Lightsey v. State, 53 So. 3d 1093, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 564, 2011 WL 148824 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Alonzo Lightsey moved to disqualify the presiding judge several months after he filed his motion for postconviction relief. The motion to disqualify was properly served and the judge did not rule on the motion within the time provided by Florida Rule of Judicial Administration 2.330(j). Under that rule, the motion is therefore deemed granted and petitioner is entitled to reassignment of his postconviction motion to a different judge. See Berube v. State, 978 So.2d 893 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008). We therefore grant the petition and quash the order which denied the motion for disqualification. The cause is remanded to the circuit court with directions that the motion for postconviction relief be reassigned to a different judge.

PETITION GRANTED.

WOLF, KAHN, and THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hilliard v. State
109 So. 3d 878 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
53 So. 3d 1093, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 564, 2011 WL 148824, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lightsey-v-state-fladistctapp-2011.