Lighthipe v. City of Orange
74 A. 1135, 76 N.J.L. 823, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 217
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Lighthipe v. City of Orange. Read the opinion of the Court — 75 N.J.L. 365 →
Opinion
The judgment under review in this case is affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Pitney in the court below.
For affirmance—Ti-ie Chiee Justice, Garrison, Swayze, Eeed, Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Voorhees, Minturn, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill, J.J. 15.
For reversal—Fone.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Lighthipe v. City of Orange, 74 A. 1135, 76 N.J.L. 823, 1908 N.J. LEXIS 217 (N.J. 1908).
74 A. 1135 (Lighthipe v. City of Orange) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.