Lightbourne v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Lightbourne v. State

920 So. 2d 776, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1835, 2006 WL 335653

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 15, 2006

DocketNo. 3D05-2952

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 920 So. 2d 776 (Lightbourne v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Lightbourne v. State, 920 So. 2d 776, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1835, 2006 WL 335653 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Hartman Lightbourne seeks a belated appeal from judgment and sentence rendered January 31, 2005. Because Lightb-ourne failed to file a specific motion to withdraw his plea within 30 days of sentencing, we deny his petition for belated appeal. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(i); Fla. RApp. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A). We do so without prejudice to Lightbourne to timely file a post-conviction petition pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Dooley v. State, 789 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (holding that defendant is not precluded from filing a rule 3.850 motion to withdraw his plea merely because he did not file a motion to withdraw pursuant to rule 3.170(1)).

Petition for belated appeal denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Hartman Lightbourne seeks a belated appeal from judgment and sentence rendered January 31, 2005. Because Lightb-ourne failed to file a specific motion to withdraw his plea within 30 days of sentencing, we deny his petition for belated appeal. Fla. R.Crim. P. 3.170(i); Fla. RApp. P. 9.140(b)(2)(A). We do so without prejudice to Lightbourne to timely file a post-conviction petition pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Dooley v. State, 789 So.2d 1082 (Fla. 1st DCA 2001) (holding that defendant is not precluded from filing a rule 3.850 motion to withdraw his plea merely because he did not file a motion to withdraw pursuant to rule 3.170(1)).

Petition for belated appeal denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

920 So. 2d 776, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 1835, 2006 WL 335653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lightbourne-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack