Liggins v. Bouffault

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Liggins v. Bouffault. Read the opinion of the Court — 434 F. App'x 237
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 20, 2011·No. 10-2239·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-2239

KENNETH D. LIGGINS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ROBINA R. BOUFFAULT; CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,

Defendants – Appellees.

No. 11-1083

KENNETH D. LIGGINS,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ROBINA R. BOUFFAULT; CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (5:09-cv-00077-gec-bwc)

Submitted: May 3, 2011 Decided: May 20, 2011

Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kenneth D. Liggins, Appellant Pro Se. Stacy Leann Haney, REED SMITH, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

2 PER CURIAM:

Kenneth D. Liggins appeals the district court’s orders

denying his motion for a new trial, entering final judgment on

the jury verdict, and denying his motion for transcripts at

government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Liggins v. Clarke County School Bd.,

No. 5:09-cv-00077-gec-bwc (W.D. Va. Oct. 28, 2010; Dec. 6,

2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Liggins v. Bouffault, (4th Cir. 2011).

Liggins v. Bouffault (Liggins v. Bouffault) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.