Liggins v. Bouffault
This text of Liggins v. Bouffault (Liggins v. Bouffault) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-2239
KENNETH D. LIGGINS,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ROBINA R. BOUFFAULT; CLARKE COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD,
Defendants – Appellees.
No. 11-1083
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Glen E. Conrad, Chief District Judge. (5:09-cv-00077-gec-bwc)
Submitted: May 3, 2011 Decided: May 20, 2011
Before WILKINSON, MOTZ, and AGEE, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Kenneth D. Liggins, Appellant Pro Se. Stacy Leann Haney, REED SMITH, LLP, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 PER CURIAM:
Kenneth D. Liggins appeals the district court’s orders
denying his motion for a new trial, entering final judgment on
the jury verdict, and denying his motion for transcripts at
government expense. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. See Liggins v. Clarke County School Bd.,
No. 5:09-cv-00077-gec-bwc (W.D. Va. Oct. 28, 2010; Dec. 6,
2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Liggins v. Bouffault, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/liggins-v-bouffault-ca4-2011.