Lifecare International, Incorporated, a California Corporation v. Cd Medical, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, C.D. Medical, B v. a Dutch Corporation
85 F.3d 519, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13324, 1996 WL 287970
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
DecidedMay 31, 1996
Docket94-4595
StatusPublished
Cited by13 cases
This text of 85 F.3d 519 (Lifecare International, Incorporated, a California Corporation v. Cd Medical, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, C.D. Medical, B v. a Dutch Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Lifecare International, Incorporated, a California Corporation v. Cd Medical, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, C.D. Medical, B v. a Dutch Corporation, 85 F.3d 519, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13324, 1996 WL 287970 (11th Cir. 1996).
Opinion
The motion to recall the mandate filed by Movant Craig Edward Stein is GRANTED.
We modify and supplement our opinion in this case with this observation:
The statements by the Court in discussing the issues raised in this appeal concerning alleged bias on the part of Mr. Stein are based upon the record created by the parties to this case. As a nonparty, Mr. Stein was not entitled to present evidence or otherwise to respond to the allegations. Thus, the statements in the opinion should not be interpreted to represent conclusions of the Court about the actual conduct of Mr. Stein.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
RHC Operating LLC v. New York Hotel & Motel Trades Council, AFL-CIO
S.D. New York, 2022
Aegis Capital Corporation v. Cohen
S.D. Florida, 2019
Venus Lines Agency, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Cvg International America, Inc., Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant
234 F.3d 1225 (Eleventh Circuit, 2000)
Venus Lines Agency, Inc. v. CVG International Amer
Eleventh Circuit, 2000
Scott v. Prudential Securities, Inc.
141 F.3d 1007 (Eleventh Circuit, 1998)
Scott v. Prudential Securities
141 F.3d 1007 (Eleventh Circuit, 1998)
Nautica International, Inc. v. Intermarine USA, L.P.
5 F. Supp. 2d 1333 (S.D. Florida, 1998)
Montes v. Shearson Lehman Brothers
128 F.3d 1456 (Eleventh Circuit, 1997)
Wages v. Smith Barney Harris Upham & Co.
937 P.2d 715 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1997)
Eaton Vance Distributors, Inc. v. Ulrich
692 So. 2d 915 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Tower Oak, Inc. v. Selmonosky (In Re Selmonosky)
204 B.R. 820 (N.D. Georgia, 1996)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
85 F.3d 519, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 13324, 1996 WL 287970, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lifecare-international-incorporated-a-california-corporation-v-cd-ca11-1996.