Lidecker Tool Co. v. Coghill, Constable
This text of 1912 OK 808 (Lidecker Tool Co. v. Coghill, Constable) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On January. 11, 1911, the motion for a new trial was overruled by John Q. Adams, the judge pro tempore, who tried the cause in the lower court. At that time the plaintiff *135 in error (plaintiff below) was granted an extension of 60 days in which to prepare and serve a case-made. On March 3, 1911, the said John Q. Adams,'as judge pro tempore, again extended the time for 60 days in which to prepare and serve a case-made. The case-made was served on May B, 1911, and settled by the said John Q. Adams, the special judge, on May 22, 1911.
It is settled that a special judge, or judge pro tempore, after he has ceased to sit as a judge, has no power to extend the time to serve a case-made, and “where he attempts to do so his act is a nullity.” Murphey v. Favors, 31 Okla. 162, 120 Pac. 641; Casner v. Wooley, 28 Okla. 424, 114 Pac. 700; Horner v. Goltry & Sons, 23 Okla. 905, 101 Pac. 1111; City of Shawnee v. Farrell, 22 Okla. 652, 98 Pac. 942.
The proceeding in error is therefore dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1912 OK 808, 128 P. 680, 35 Okla. 134, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 525, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/lidecker-tool-co-v-coghill-constable-okla-1912.