Casner v. Wooley

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Casner v. Wooley

1911 OK 79, 114 P. 700, 28 Okla. 424, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 113

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 21, 1911

Docket1320

StatusPublished

Cited by8 cases

This text of 1911 OK 79 (Casner v. Wooley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Casner v. Wooley, 1911 OK 79, 114 P. 700, 28 Okla. 424, 1911 Okla. LEXIS 113 (Okla. 1911).

Pincite

Opinion

TURNER, C. J.

On January 9, 1909, tbe special judge trying the cause, after overruling the motion for a new trial, entered .judgment against the plaintiff, taxed him with the cost, and gave him 90 days in which to prepare and serve a case-made. After •the expiration of the term, and after he had ceased to sit as such, .•said judge, on March 30, 1909, granted an extension of time for .said purpose, and the case-made in question was signed and settled by him within the time thus extended.

The petition in error should be dismissed, pursuant to the motion filed. The law in Hornor et al. v. Goltry & Sons, 23 Okla. 905, 101 Pac. 1111, and cases there cited, govern this case.

It is so ordered.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI