Lick v. Town of Moravia

22 N.Y.S. 1121, 63 Hun 636, 73 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 636, 50 N.Y. St. Rep. 938
New York Supreme Court·Decided January 18, 1893·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

No opinion. Court declines to consider this appeal, (submitted without argument,) for the reason that the papers contained in the appeal book are not certified to be “a copy of the papers used before the court on the hearing of the motion,” as required by section 1353 of the Code of Civil Procedure; also that the case, which is a part of the appeal book, was not procured to be settled and signed by the judge before whom the action was tried, as required by sections 997 and 999 of the Code of Civil Procedure and rule 35 of general rules of practice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lick v. Town of Moravia, 22 N.Y.S. 1121, 63 Hun 636, 73 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 636, 50 N.Y. St. Rep. 938 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1893).

22 N.Y.S. 1121 (Lick v. Town of Moravia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Perdue v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.
326 P.2d 1026 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1958)
Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. Solomon
240 A.D. 255 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1934)
La Prelle v. Brown
220 S.W. 151 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1920)
Austin v. Brown Bros.
164 P. 95 (Idaho Supreme Court, 1917)
Bartlett v. Bunn
5 Silv. Sup. 87 (New York Supreme Court, 1889)